English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 29490/55136 (53%)
造訪人次 : 1497066      線上人數 : 412
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於CMUR管理 到手機版
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.cmu.edu.tw/ir/handle/310903500/824


    題名: 長期高血壓用藥病患與新生糖尿病發生率之研究;A Study of Long-term Effect of Antihypertensive drugs on the Risk of New-onset Diabetes
    作者: 李淑怡;Shu-Yi Li
    貢獻者: 醫務管理學研究所碩士班
    關鍵詞: 抗高血壓藥物;新生糖尿病;高血壓;Antihypertensive drugs;New-onset diabetes;hypertension
    日期: 2008-06-13
    上傳時間: 2009-08-12 16:22:31 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 目的:降血壓藥物目前已知和新生糖尿病有關,但是無論如何所有類別之降血壓藥物和新生糖尿病之間的關係仍然未完全明瞭。本研究之目的在調查所有類別之降血壓藥物和新生糖尿病之關連。
    方法:這是一個從2002年1月至2006年12月的回溯前瞻性5年的研究。資料來自中區健保局門診高血壓病患的申報檔。本研究評估高血壓病患在追蹤5年後新生糖尿病的勝算比(OR),以追蹤5年沒有新生糖尿病病患為對照組。
    結果:在所有23,280位病患之中,有4,183位新生糖尿病的產生。新生糖尿病勝算比危險較高的為單一使用利尿劑(勝算比1.10;95%信賴區間1.01-1.20),乙型阻斷劑(勝算比1.12;95%信賴區間1.04-1.21)和鈣離子阻斷劑(勝算比1.10;95%信賴區間1.02-1.18)。如果單一使用血管轉化?“磻蹌砥]勝算比0.92,95%信賴區間0.84-1.00)或甲型阻斷劑(勝算比0.88,95%信賴區間0.80-0.98)和沒有使用者比較,有較低勝算比危險性。血管轉化?§筐?器阻斷劑和血管擴張劑,則無關連。合併使用二種降血壓藥物之病人之中,產生新生糖尿病的勝算比危險性則以利尿劑加乙型阻斷劑(勝算比1.14, 95%信賴區間1.06-1.22),利尿劑加鈣離子阻斷劑(勝算比1.09;95%信賴區間1.01-1.17),和乙型阻斷劑加鈣離子阻斷劑(勝算比1.11;95%信賴區間1.03-1.19)比沒有使用者有較高的風險性。合併二或三種藥物治療的病患中,只要合併血管轉化?“磻蹌祟M甲型阻斷劑皆可降低新生糖尿病的危險性,而合併使用血管轉化?§筐?器阻斷劑和血管擴張劑,則較無影響。
    結論:本研究建議高血壓患者,使用血管轉化?“磻蹌祟M甲型阻斷劑可降低新生糖尿病的危險性;而使用利尿劑、乙型阻斷劑和鈣離子阻斷劑則可增加新生糖尿病的危險性。

    Aims:Antihypertensive drugs have been linked to new-onset diabetes (NOD); however, data on the effect of these drugs on the development of NOD in hypertensive patients has not been well determined. This study aimed to investigate the association between antihypertensive drugs and NOD.
    Methods:This was a retrospective cohort study performed using data from claim forms provided to the central region branch of the Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan from January 2002 to December 2006. Prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs before the index date were retrieved from a prescription database. We estimated the odds ratios (ORs) of NOD associated with antihypertensive drug use; nondiabetic subjects served as the reference group.
    Results:A total of 4183 NOD cases were identified in 23280 hypertensive patients during the study period. The risk of NOD was higher among monotherapy users of diuretics (OR, 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.20), beta-blockers (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.21), and calcium channel blockers (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18) than among non-users. Patients who took angiotensin- converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-1.00), or alpha-blockers (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.98) were at a lower risk of developing NOD than non-users. Angiotensin receptor blockers, and vasodilators were not associated with risk of NOD.
    The risk of NOD was higher among double combinations of diuretics plus beta-blockers (OR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.22), diuretics plus calcium channel blockers (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17), and beta-blockers plus calcium channel blockers (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19) than among non-users. Patients who took angiotensin- converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, or alpha-blockers were at a lower risk of among double or three drug combinations developing NOD than non-users. Angiotensin receptor blockers, and vasodilators were not associated with risk of NOD among double or three drug combinations.
    Conclusions:The results of this study suggest that hypertensive patients who take ACE inhibitors or alpha-blockers are at lower risk of NOD. Diuretics, beta-blockers, and calcium-blockers are associated with a significant increase in the risk of NOD.
    顯示於類別:[醫務管理學系暨碩士班] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML13檢視/開啟


    在CMUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

     


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋