English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 29490/55136 (53%)
造訪人次 : 1498172      線上人數 : 182
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於CMUR管理 到手機版
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.cmu.edu.tw/ir/handle/310903500/770


    題名: 基層醫師對實施基層分科總額預算之意願及影響因素—以中部四縣市為例;Willingness of primary care physicians for department global budget implementation and the associated factors in central Taiwan
    作者: 陳文侯;Wen-Hou Chen
    貢獻者: 醫務管理學研究所
    關鍵詞: 總額預算;基層醫師;分科管理;分科總額預算;primary care physicians;department global budget;department global budget demonstration
    日期: 2008-06-13
    上傳時間: 2009-08-12 16:22:06 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 目的:探討實施基層分科總額管理後對醫師執業之影響及滿意度,並了解基層醫師對實施分科總額預算之意願及其影響因素。
    方法:針對中部四縣市所有西醫基層執業醫師,利用結構式問卷以郵寄方式進行普查,共發出2,673份問卷,回收579份問卷。除描述性分析及雙變項分析外,以羅吉斯迴歸分析探討影響基層醫師是否贊成分科總額預算之相關因素。
    結果: 55%的基層醫師認為分科方式不合理,54.63%認為分科管理對未來發展為負面影響,整體滿意度認為普通者佔40.81%,認為不滿意者佔38.52%,認為滿意者佔20.67%。在都會區執業競爭較激烈,整體滿意度較低。不贊成實施分科總額預算者佔57.99%。對於實施繼續分科總額之意願,泌尿科、外科、骨科、耳鼻喉科及婦產科明顯贊成,而精神科、皮膚科及家醫科傾向不贊成。由羅吉斯迴歸分析結果發現影響醫師是否贊成實施分科總額預算之因素為「實施後基層醫師間之競爭度」、「實施後平均每週看診次數之變化」、「執業年資」、「分科方式合理性」、「對該科未來之影響」及「科別」。實施分科管理後平均每週看診次數增加越多者、執業年資越長者、認為分科方式合理性越高者、對未來發展之影響越正面者,就越贊成分科總額。實施分科管理後基層醫師感覺越競爭者,就越不贊成實施分科總額。
    結論與建議:基層醫師對於分科管理的各項滿意度均偏低,分科管理較不利於都會區之醫師,多數基層醫師不贊成進一步實施分科總額預算。建議加強溝通宣導、檢討總額預算制度、降低基層醫師執業不利因素之影響程度、注重整體的醫療品質、改進分科方式及鼓勵基層醫師至鄉鎮地區執業。

    Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the influences of implementation of department global budget (DGB) demonstration on primary care physicians’ practice and the satisfaction with DGB. In addition, this study explored the willingness of primary care physicians (PCPs) for DGB implementation and the associated factors.
    Method :This study adopted the survey method of a self-designed structured questionnaire. All the PCPs who were undertaking national health insurance at western medicine clinics were selected with a total of 2673 physicians on May 1, 2007. 579 valid responses were received with a response rate of 21.66%.
    Result:55% PCPs thought the way of partitioning departments was unreasonable. 54.63% PCPs thought the DGB had a harmful effect on department development. 38.52% PCPs were dissatisfied about DGB while 20.67% were satisfied and 40.81% were unremarkable.The satisfaction was lower at big city probably due to higher competition. 57.99% PCPs disagreed with DGB. The PCPs in urology, surgery, orthopedics, ENT, obstetrics and gynecology had higher agreement on continuing DGB implementation, but PCPs in psychiatry, dermatology and family medicine inclined to disagree.The factors that affect the agreement of DGB included the competition after DGB, the work time alteration after DGB, years of practice, rationality of the way of partitioning departments, the anticipated effect on department development and the variety of departments through logistic regression analysis.
    Conclusion:The satisfaction of DGB demonstration was relatively low. The DGB is disadvantageous to PCPs at big city. The majority of PCPs disagreed with DGB implementation.
    顯示於類別:[醫務管理學系暨碩士班] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    cmu-97-9590952-1.pdf1224KbAdobe PDF650檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML6檢視/開啟


    在CMUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

     


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋