中國醫藥大學機構典藏 China Medical University Repository, Taiwan:Item 310903500/40237
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 29490/55136 (53%)
造访人次 : 1512697      在线人数 : 245
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于CMUR ‧ 管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.cmu.edu.tw/ir/handle/310903500/40237


    题名: A Comparison of the Classic and a Modified Laryngeal Mask Airway (OPLAC?) in Adult Patients
    作者: 林必盛(Bih-Chern Lin);吳世銓(Rick Sai-Chuen Wu);陳坤堡(Kuen-Bao Chen);楊美惠(Mei-Hui Yang);羅于倩(Yu-Chien Lo);江易穎(Yi-Ying Chiang)*
    贡献者: 中國附醫麻醉部
    关键词: Laryngeal Masks, Laryngeal Mask Airway, Insertion Time, Airway Sealing Pressure, Gastric Insufflations, Fiberscope, Sore Throat, Pharyngitis
    日期: 2011-03
    上传时间: 2011-09-07 09:26:46 (UTC+8)
    摘要: BACKGROUND: A modified disposable laryngeal mask airway (LMA) (Oro-Pharyngo-Laryngeal
    Airway Cap, OPLAC?) was developed in our department. In this study, we compared the
    performance of the LMA Classic? with that of the OPLAC.
    METHODS: This was a randomized, single-blinded, crossover study involving 60 paralyzed,
    anesthetized adult patients. Both devices were inserted into each patient in different sequences
    after anesthesia had been induced. In 30 patients, the LMA was inserted first and in 30 patients,
    the OPLAC was inserted first. The success rate, insertion time, fiberoptic view, peak airway
    pressure, sealing pressure, incidence of gastric insufflations, trace of blood on the device, and
    incidence of postoperative sore throat were evaluated.
    RESULTS: The success rate of placement on the first attempt was high for both devices. The
    insertion time was significantly shorter and better engagement was noted on fiberoptic view with
    the OPLAC than with the LMA. The sealing pressure was significantly higher and the incidence of
    gastric insufflations was significantly lower with the OPLAC. The overall incidence of sore throat
    was 13.33%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both devices have comparable airflow resistance and are easy to insert. The
    OPLAC requires less insertion time, has less variation on insertion time, fits better into the
    laryngopharynx, is less likely to cause gastric insufflations, and has a higher sealing
    pressure.
    關聯: ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 112():
    显示于类别:[台中附設醫院] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    20101229102938.pdf1241KbAdobe PDF488检视/开启


    在CMUR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

     

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈