中國醫藥大學機構典藏 China Medical University Repository, Taiwan:Item 310903500/3680
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 29490/55136 (53%)
Visitors : 1505719      Online Users : 379
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    CMUR > College of Medicine > School of Medicine > Journal articles >  Item 310903500/3680
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.cmu.edu.tw/ir/handle/310903500/3680


    Title: CYP17 gene promoter allelic variant is not associated with prostate cancer
    Authors: 林正介(Cheng-Chieh Lin);吳錫金(Wu,Hsi-Chin);陳汶吉(Chen Wen-Chi);陳慧毅(Huey-Yi Chen);蔡輔仁(Fuu-Jen Tsai)
    Contributors: 醫學院醫學系學士班家庭醫學科;中國附醫社區醫學部家庭醫學科
    Keywords: CYP17 gene;Prostate cancer;Cytochrome p450c17α enzyme;Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
    Date: 2003-07
    Issue Date: 2009-08-20 18:49:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Prostate cancer is the most common urological malignancy in Taiwan. The formation of prostate cancer has been reported to be associated with androgen. Two key steps in the sex steroid synthesis are mediated by the enzyme cytochrome P450c17α which is encoded in the CYP17 gene. Our aim was to investigate whether a polymorphism of CYP17 gene could be used as a genetic marker for associating prostate cancer. In this study, we compared the frequency of the C/T polymorphism of CYP17 gene 5′-UTR promoter region between 93 patients with prostate cancer and 121 healthy male volunteers (age, >60 years). The result revealed no significant association between the CYP17 genotype and prostate cancer (P = .781). Therefore, CYP17 C/T polymorphism is not a valid genetic marker for prostate cancer. Although a possible interaction between CYP17 gene C/T polymorphism and SP-1 transcription factor has been reported in the literature, we did not find any evidence for this the difference among clinical staging, pathological grading, or responsiveness to hormonal therapy in prostate cancer.
    Relation: UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS 21(4):262~265
    Appears in Collections:[School of Medicine] Journal articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    58KbUnknown469View/Open


    All items in CMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

     


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback