中國醫藥大學機構典藏 China Medical University Repository, Taiwan:Item 310903500/30221
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 29490/55136 (53%)
Visitors : 1997894      Online Users : 274
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    CMUR > China Medical University Hospital > Jurnal articles >  Item 310903500/30221
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.cmu.edu.tw/ir/handle/310903500/30221


    Title: Protection by hot water extract of Panax notoginseng on chronic ethanol-induced hepatotoxicity
    Authors: Lin, CF;Wong, KL;Wu, RSC;Huang, TC;Liu, CF
    Contributors: 附設醫院麻醉部;Natl Taipei Coll Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan;China Med Coll Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Taichung, Taiwan;Mackay Mem Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Taipei, Taiwan
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2010-09-24 14:51:23 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
    Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Intranasal corticosteroid preparations can relieve symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Different aqueous corticosteroid forms have been developed for intranasal use. The objectives of this study were to compare efficacy and safety between fluticasone propionate and budesonide in the treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: The study was conducted in a prospective and randomized manner; a total of 24 adult patients were enrolled. All patients received MAST allergen test at entry and again at 2 months after treatments. Fourteen patients received fluticasone propionate 200 mug once daily, and 10 patients received budesonide 200 mug twice daily. To investigate the efficacy of fluticasone propionate and budesonide, a subjective scoring system was designed to evaluate the symptom improvement of patients. Adverse events were recorded on a diary card then were analyzed. Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Analysis on patient-based symptom scores revealed that both fluticasone propionate and budesonide were equally efficacious in improving the symptoms of nasal blockage, sneezing, nasal itching, and watery rhinorrhea. There were no significant side effects reported for both groups during this follow-up period. However, analysis showed that the fluticasone propionate group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in some MAST allergen tests (Candida, mite, house dust; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Clinically, fluticasone propionate 200 mug once daily was efficacious as budesonide 200 mug twice daily in the relief of allergic rhinitis symptoms. However, fluticasone propionate can achieve greater immunologic improvement. Both preparations showed no evidence of short-term side effects.
    Relation: PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH 17(9):1119-1122
    Appears in Collections:[China Medical University Hospital] Jurnal articles

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in CMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

     


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback