資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
http://ir.cmu.edu.tw/ir/handle/310903500/12045
|
| 題名: | 《三國職官表》蜀漢部分考釋 |
| 作者: | 洪武雄(Hung,Wu-Hsiung) |
| 貢獻者: | 通識教育中心 |
| 關鍵詞: | 三國;蜀漢;三國職官表 、政治制度;Three Kingdoms;Shu Han;The Three Kingdoms' government officials;Political system |
| 日期: | 2006-07-31 |
| 上傳時間: | 2009-09-01 15:43:13 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 《史記》、《漢書》、《後漢書》皆有表志，綴縫紀傳之不足，惟《三國志》略而不詳。清?洪飴孫撰《三國職官表》，「欲使考三國官制者有所據依」，其後治三國官制者幾無不援引此書。其於各職官大抵皆「志其居官之人，將以驗此官之有無，記其遷轉之階，即以較諸職之高下」。其頗思以蜀漢為正統，卻不得不屈從現實，蓋「魏制較詳，蜀官最略，以詳綴略，勢有不能參校互稽。」但天下三分，國各有制，「曹氏官制，名與漢同而實變之是則紛更升降與漢大殊。吳蜀名因漢制亦有異同，蜀猶略祖東京，吳則大形增省。」因此以蜀官綴於魏制，不免偶有牽強附會、名實有異者。或品位有別，如四征四鎮將軍；或職掌不同，如領、護軍；或隸屬不同，如軍師者。又如州郡牧守於曹魏則量多職微，無需詳載，但於蜀漢則位高職重，卻因綴乎魏後，不免受限。《三國職官表》既為研究三國政治制度的必備參考書籍，但其中蜀漢部分因體例所限不免有諸多疏漏，實有進一步考釋增補的必要。本計劃旨在擴大資料蒐集的廣度與深度，正史文獻為主、金石考古為輔，佐以二十五史資料庫的檢索。以完整資料重新考釋《三國職官表》蜀漢部分，其疏漏不詳處則增補之，其隸屬謬誤處則考釋之，以利此後相關議題研究立論的依據。
In order to make some famous biographies' complete, the Historical Records, the History of the Han Dynasty, and the History of Later Han all have specific chapters to discuss the topics like government officials, astronomy and economy, while the History of the Three Kingdoms doesn't. Mr. Hung Yi-sun of Ching Dynasty wrote the book the Three Kingdoms' Government Officials hoped to make up the insufficiency of the History of the Three Kingdoms and to provide clearer references for the following researchers when they are studying the government officials of the three kingdoms. After the book was completed, it did become the necessary reference of the coming researchers of the three kingdoms' political system. Originally, Hung Yi-sun wanted to use Shu Han's system as the center, but the system of Tsao Wey's government officials was more complete, and Shu Han's was simpler. So, he finally used Tsao Wey as the center. But, at that time, the whole country was divided into three kingdoms and there was inevitably some difference among their official systems. It is inevitably far-fetched to compare the system of Shu Han to the system of Tsao Wey. For example, the names of the officials were the same but their levels, job descriptions or the in-charge departments were different. Besides, the territory of Tsao Wey was bigger and the number of its officials was bigger, but their levels were lower and without clear records. Yet, the territory of Shu Han was smaller and its local officials were more powerful. Although Shu Han's officials were more powful, they were still sometimes neglected because Shu Han was sub-linked to the system of Tsao Wey. Since The Three Kingdoms' Government Officials is the necessary reference to study the political system of the three kingdoms, it is necessary to have it further modified because there were many mistakes in the part of Shu Han. The purpose of this plan is to enlarge the range and depth of the collection of information so as to re-testify the part of Shu Han in the Three Kingdoms' Government Officials so that the mistake if this book can be reduced to the lowest level to help the following studies of the related issues and to be reference of the later researchers' studies and reports. |
| 顯示於類別: | [通識教育中心] 研究計畫
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| 94-2411-H039-001.pdf | | 965Kb | Adobe PDF | 1959 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在CMUR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
