中國醫藥大學機構典藏 China Medical University Repository, Taiwan:Item 310903500/11651
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 29490/55136 (53%)
Visitors : 1497640      Online Users : 104
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.cmu.edu.tw/ir/handle/310903500/11651


    Title: 學前兒童發展檢核表效度之探討
    Authors: 孫世恆(Sun,Shih-Heng);吳昇光(Wu,Sheng Kuang)
    Contributors: 健康照護學院物理治療學系
    Keywords: 早期療育;學前兒童發展檢核表;「嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗-篩檢題本」;同時效度 • 英文關鍵字 Early intervention;Preschool child developmental inventory;Screening test of comprehensive developmental inventory for infant and toddler;Concurrent validity
    Date: 2006-07-31
    Issue Date: 2009-09-01 15:19:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 發展遲緩兒童的篩檢是早期療育的重要工作,信效度良好的兒童發展篩檢量表則是不可或缺的工具。目前國內廣泛使用的兒童發展篩檢工具主要有「學前兒童發展檢核表」以及「嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗-篩檢題本」。但是這兩種篩檢工具是否能夠篩檢出適當比例疑似發展遲緩幼兒,本研究希望探討這兩種發展篩檢工具的篩檢率及同時效度,並探討「嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗 -篩檢題本」合理的轉介標準,以作為發展遲緩兒童篩檢工具選擇的參考。本研究以重複量測實驗設計收集幼兒發展篩檢的結果,研究者與幼扥園所以及衛生所合作,安排嬰幼兒同時接受這兩種篩檢量表的施測。本研究共收集638 名滿四個月到滿五歲的幼兒,依照「學前兒童發展檢核表」各年齡題本的年齡分為11 個年齡組。結果發現「嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗-篩檢題本」的建構效度符合兒童發展理論,「嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗-篩檢題本」適當的轉介標準有四,其中以「任一個分測驗之z 分數≦-2 則列為疑似發展障礙」最能轉介適當比例的疑似發展遲緩幼兒,「學前兒童發展檢核表」的篩檢率偏低,但是在一歲之前使用,能轉介適當比例的疑似發展遲緩幼兒。實務工作上,大於一歲的嬰幼兒,建議以「嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗-篩檢題本」進行篩檢。

    Screening children at risk for developmental delay is very important in early intervention. Developmental screening test with solid validity and reliability is necessary for this work. Preschool Child Development Checklist (PCDC) and Screening Test of Comprehensive Developmental Inventory for Infant and Toddler (CDIIT-screen) are two tools widely used in Taiwan. The purpose of this study is to investigate the validity of the screening tests and referral standard of CDIIT-screen. Repeated measure research design was employed for the study. Six hundred and thirty eight infants and toddler participated this study. They were classified into 11 groups according to PCDC age level. The result revealed that CDIIT-screen held good construct validity. There were four reasonable referral standards for CDIIT-screen. The most appropriate standard was the child would be at risk for developmental delay if the z score of any one subtest of CDIIT-screen was less than or equal to -2. The PCDC is appropriate for infants aged under 1 year old. CDIIT-screen is recommended for children age older than 1 year old.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science] Research reports

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML163View/Open


    All items in CMUR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

     


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback